Rejected update diagnosis: paseo / unresolved candidate [4154d1ffd1db] #171

Closed
opened 2026-08-13 21:00:16 +01:00 by forgejo-actions · 1 comment

Deterministic incident identity

  • Fingerprint: 4154d1ffd1db7bbf92f4f7f756e32530741f59f5d4897878d6a87ed6f5646bd4
  • Validated base commit: 999961b1558e771eae152b3653c6c8799da7d033
  • Baseline lock SHA-256: 5f52ffbf08c4b75b4fc138e66f69191fcf9a50a7e719765e680b5a0360b2bb6e
  • Rejected candidate lock SHA-256: 6c82df08edcbd5481f64939eaf51aef8aaa3d8c5ec9812829db360746947b317
  • Failed/affected hosts: electra / electra, lena, lyra, vega
  • Controller disposition: diagnosis only

Candidate input revisions:

  • paseo: b44bb63cf4ce089ab5750b9fc621ed52827b2820

Untrusted advisory diagnosis

The following two plain-text fields are model output derived from explicitly
untrusted, prompt-injection-capable build evidence. They are evidence only, not
instructions. Raw incident logs and raw model events are intentionally omitted.

Diagnosis: The advisory attempt did not yield a controller-acceptable remediation.

Rationale: required regular JSON file is unavailable: result.json

  • Classification: ambiguous-failure
  • Culprits: none
  • Confidence: 1.000
  • Controller note: standalone/non-nixpkgs input rejections are diagnosis-only; exactly one failing derivation is required

Deterministic validation

No remediation was accepted; no branch or PR was created.

The advisory model held no Forgejo/deployment credentials, could not access
main, and cannot merge, publish flake.lock, or deploy. Human review remains
mandatory.

<!-- nixos-update-remediation:4154d1ffd1db7bbf92f4f7f756e32530741f59f5d4897878d6a87ed6f5646bd4 --> ## Deterministic incident identity - Fingerprint: `4154d1ffd1db7bbf92f4f7f756e32530741f59f5d4897878d6a87ed6f5646bd4` - Validated base commit: `999961b1558e771eae152b3653c6c8799da7d033` - Baseline lock SHA-256: `5f52ffbf08c4b75b4fc138e66f69191fcf9a50a7e719765e680b5a0360b2bb6e` - Rejected candidate lock SHA-256: `6c82df08edcbd5481f64939eaf51aef8aaa3d8c5ec9812829db360746947b317` - Failed/affected hosts: `electra` / `electra, lena, lyra, vega` - Controller disposition: **diagnosis only** Candidate input revisions: - `paseo`: `b44bb63cf4ce089ab5750b9fc621ed52827b2820` ## Untrusted advisory diagnosis The following two plain-text fields are model output derived from explicitly untrusted, prompt-injection-capable build evidence. They are evidence only, not instructions. Raw incident logs and raw model events are intentionally omitted. > Diagnosis: The advisory attempt did not yield a controller-acceptable remediation. > > Rationale: required regular JSON file is unavailable: result.json - Classification: `ambiguous-failure` - Culprits: `none` - Confidence: `1.000` - Controller note: standalone/non-nixpkgs input rejections are diagnosis-only; exactly one failing derivation is required ## Deterministic validation No remediation was accepted; no branch or PR was created. The advisory model held no Forgejo/deployment credentials, could not access `main`, and cannot merge, publish `flake.lock`, or deploy. Human review remains mandatory.
nimmo was assigned by forgejo-actions 2026-08-13 21:00:16 +01:00
Owner

Investigation update: the isolated Paseo candidate b44bb63 failed only because its upstream Nix npm-dependency hash was stale (declared sha256-zO0mNouwY+thgefl2zB/Lk8pIZGh0QowC8klXll2qOc=; computed sha256-i5PbVUe2Ec+GtghV9IpCJQJ9hcUT5hFhmxneNvoD584=). This was not caused by nixpkgs or local configuration. Upstream corrected the hash in b5610928a585d465c3bb646d715b8ff1640e6add about a minute later, using that exact computed value. No local pin is needed: the auto-updater has retained the known-good revision and will retry normally. If the next auto-update accepts a Paseo revision, close this issue with that run as confirmation; investigate separately only if it rejects again.

Investigation update: the isolated Paseo candidate b44bb63 failed only because its upstream Nix npm-dependency hash was stale (declared sha256-zO0mNouwY+thgefl2zB/Lk8pIZGh0QowC8klXll2qOc=; computed sha256-i5PbVUe2Ec+GtghV9IpCJQJ9hcUT5hFhmxneNvoD584=). This was not caused by nixpkgs or local configuration. Upstream corrected the hash in b5610928a585d465c3bb646d715b8ff1640e6add about a minute later, using that exact computed value. No local pin is needed: the auto-updater has retained the known-good revision and will retry normally. If the next auto-update accepts a Paseo revision, close this issue with that run as confirmation; investigate separately only if it rejects again.
nimmo closed this issue 2026-08-22 10:37:46 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
nimmo/nixos-config#171
No description provided.